Providing resources for studying law
Custom Search
   Home      Horsfall v Thomas
Horsfall v Thomas [1862] 1 H&C 90

The claimant purchased a gun which had a concealed defect. His action for misrepresentation failed as he hadn't inspected the gun before purchasing it. Therefore the misrepresentation did not induce him to enter the contract as he was unaware of it.
Back to lecture outline on misrepresentation in Contract Law