Logo
Providing resources for studying law
Contract law
     
     e.lawresources.co.uk
 
Law revision notes
    
...providing resources for
studying law.
 
Law student
 
Helping you to achieve....
 
studying law
 
 
law resources
 
unfair terms
 
 
 
Custom Search
Home      Tort law      Policy factors
 
 
 
 
 
                  Duty of Care - Policy factors

 

In applying the third stage of the Caparo test, of fair, just and reasonable, the courts take certain policy factors into account. Policy factors which may influence the court include such issues as:

 
 
 
Loss allocation:
 
Who can afford to bear the loss?
 
Which of the parties have insurance/ is the situation one subject to compulsory insurance?
 
Is the defendant a publicly funded body?
 
 
The floodgates:-
 
Will imposing liability lead to a high volume of new claims?
 
What effect would this have on cost of insurance or its availability?
 
Will the courts be able to cope with the volume of cases?
 
 
 
 
 The practical effects of imposing liability
 
 
Will the imposition of a duty of care act as a deterrent or raise standards? 
 
Will imposing a duty have an adverse effect on decision making?
 
Will it effect the allocation of resources away from necessities?  
 
 

These issues often arise in the context of publicly funded bodies and in particular in relation to the police, the CPS, Local authorities and emergency services.


 
 
 
 
1. The police

 

a).Duty in detecting crime:

 
Alexandrou v Oxford [1993] 4 All ER 328


 
Osman v Ferguson [1993] 4 All ER 344

 
 
Osman v United Kingdom Case No 87/1997/871/1083
 


b). No duty of care to prevent injury:

 
 
Ancell v McDermott [1993] 4 All ER 355

 
 
 
 
c). No duty is owed to provide protection, support and assistance to victims and witnesses of crime:

 
 
 
 
 
The common law principles are not to be extended to comply with the ECHR where the case involves death threats and right to life:
 
 
 
 
 
 
d. A duty of care is owed in respect of selecting which officers have access to firearms:
 
 


 
 
2. The CPS

The Crown Prosecution Service do not owe a duty of care in decision making regarding prosecutions:
 
 
 
 
3. Solicitors and barristers
 
 
Barristers and solicitors used to be immune from negligence claims resulting from their conduct in court proceedings:
 


Rondel v Worsely [1967] 3 WLR 1666

 
 
 
This immunity was subsequently lifted and solicitors and barristers now owe a duty of care in the conduct of advocacy in court:
 
Arthur Hall v Simons [2000] 3 WLR 543

 
 
3. Local authorities:

 
The courts are reluctant to impose liability on local authorities particularly where it would impact on decision making or allocation of resources:

 
Phelps v Hillingdon LBC [2000] 3 WLR 776

 
W v Essex County Council [2000] 2 WLR 601


 
4. Emergency services:

No duty is owed to attend an emergency, a duty  of care will be imposed where the emergency service attend and their actions increase the damage:

 


See also the duty owed to fire fighters:
 
 
Ogwo v Taylor [1987] 3 WLR 1145

 
Salmon v Seafarer Restaurant [1983] 3 All ER 729


 
Other matters relating to policy
 

 
A duty will not be imposed if it would disrupt existing agreed liabilities:

 
 
A duty of care extends to those who are not yet born:

 
 
 
 
 
Studying law
contract law
contract consideration
criminal law
tort law
legal
legal research
contract terms
case law
statutes
law students
studying law
A level law
Law resources
study aids law
help with law
legal careers
law study help
Criminal law
offer and acceptance
law of negligence
unfair terms
sale of goods
frustration of contract