Providing resources for studying law
Custom Search
   Home      R v Feely
R v Feely (1973) QB 530 Court of Appeal

The appellant was the manager in a betting shop. He borrowed £30 from the till and maintained that he intended to replace it within a few days. The trial judge held that his actions were clearly dishonest and his intention to replace the money was irrelevant.


His conviction was quashed. The trial judge should have put the issue of dishonesty to the jury.
Back to lecture outline on theft