E-law cases
Custom Search
   Case summaries      R v Linekar

R v Linekar [1995] 2 Cr App R 49

A prostitute had sexual intercourse with the defendant on the understanding that he would pay her £25. He in fact never paid and never intended to pay. It was held that the fraud did not vitiate consent as to the nature or quality of the act. The defendant’s conviction for rape was quashed.
Back to lecture outline on consent in criminal law