|
R v Olugboja [1982] QB 320 Court of Appeal
Two girls, Jayne aged 16 and Karen 17, had been
offered a lift home from a disco by Mr Lawal. They accepted the lift, however, instead
of taking them home he drove to his home in the opposite direction. The girls
refused to go in and started walking off. He followed them in the car picked up
Jayne and drove off and raped her. He then picked Karen up and took them both back
to his home where the appellant was. Lawal took Karen upstairs and raped her.
The appellant turned off the lights told Jayne to take off her trousers. She
was crying and complied out of fear. The appellant proceeded to have sexual
intercourse. Jayne did not resist, struggle or scream. The appellant was
convicted of rape and appealed.
Held:
Appeal dismissed conviction upheld.
Dunn LJ:
“The jury should be directed that consent, or the
absence of it, is to be given its ordinary meaning and if need be, by way of
example, that there is a difference between consent and submission; every
consent involves a submission, but it by no means follows that a mere
submission involves consent.”
|