e-lawresources.co.uk

It is currently Thu Sep 09, 2010 6:55 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Custom Search
www.oli.co.uk


Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Bourhill v Young [1943] AC 92
PostPosted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 9:33 pm 
Online
Site Admin

Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 11:17 pm
Posts: 699
Bourhill v Young [1943] AC 92

The claimant was a pregnant fishwife. She got off a tram and as she reached to get her basket off the tram, the defendant drove his motorcycle past the tram at excessive speed and collided with a car 50 feet away from where the claimant was standing. The defendant was killed by the impact. The claimant heard the collusion but did not see it. A short time later, the claimant walked past where the incident occurred. The body had been removed but there was a lot of blood on the road. The claimant went into shock and her baby was still born.

Held:

No duty of care was owed by the defendant to the claimant. There was not sufficient proximity between the claimant and defendant when the incident occurred.

Back to lecture outline on Duty of Care http://www.e-lawresources.co.uk/Duty-of-care.php

_________________
http://www.e-lawresources.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Translated by MaĆ«l Soucaze © 2009 phpBB.fr