Providing resources for studying law
Custom Search
   Home      Broome v Perkins
Broome v Perkins [1987] Crim LR 271

The appellant was a diabetic. He had driven erratically while suffering from hypo-glycaemia (low blood sugar level caused by an excess of insulin in the bloodstream). His defence of non-insane automatism failed because of evidence that he had exercised conscious control over his car by veering away from other vehicles so as to avoid a collision and braking. His conviction for driving without undue care and attention was therefore upheld.
Back to lecture outline on non-insane automatism in Criminal Law